Quantcast Ventricular Assist Devices -- CTSNet FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
CTSNet Logo


FAQ
Adult Cardiac Surgery FAQs
General Thoracic Surgery FAQs
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery FAQs

CTSNet Home
 
 
Adult Cardiac Surgery FAQs
Section Editor: William Baumgartner, M.D.


Ventricular Assist Devices
William S Pierce


   

1.

What types of ventricular assist devices are available for bridging to transplant?

Three devices are available and have been used in patients who are transplant candidates but whose hemodynamics are inadequate, even with the use of intravenous inotropic agents, to allow the patient to wait until a donor heart has been identified.

The HeartMate ventricular assist pump is a pneumatically powered device that is implanted in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. The pneumatic air hose exits from the lower half of the abdominal wall and is attached to a pneumatic power unit. This device is FDA approved and is now being used in a number of centers in the United States and abroad. An electric version is available on an investigational basis and allows the patient to be considerably more mobile. With this system, a wire and vent tube pass through the lower half of the abdominal wall but, in place of the pneumatic drive unit, a shoulder holster with electric batteries is used to power the device.

The Thoratec assist pump, manufactured by Thoratec Laboratories, Inc., is a pneumatically powered device that is placed on the anterior abdominal wall. Blood can be taken from the left ventricular apex and pumped into the aorta. The cannulas pass through the chest wall in a manner similar to that of a conventional chest tube. A pneumatic power unit is used to provide the air pulses.

The Novacor ventricular assist pump is an electrically powered device built by the Novacor division of Baxter Laboratories. The pump is implanted in the left upper quadrant and the electric line and vent tube are passed through the lower anterior abdominal wall. The device is available in this country on an investigational basis, but FDA approval for open sale should be obtained in the near future.

 

NEXT Question | TOP of Page | FAQs HOME | CTSNet HOME


   

2.

What are the major differences between the three types of ventricular assist devices that are being used?

The HeartMate assist pump is an implanted device that uses tissue valves. The blood contacting component of the pump housing is lined with tiny titanium beads while the flexible diaphragm is a textured surface. The patients are maintained on aspirin. This allows a thin, fibrin layer to develop on the blood contacting surface. The device has been generally free of thromboembolic complications. Blood can be taken only from the left ventricular apex and is pumped into the ascending aorta. The device cannot be used to access atrial blood, nor can it be used for right ventricular support.

The Thoratec pump uses tilting disk-type mechanical valves and a highly smooth blood contacting surface. Patients in whom this device is employed are maintained on low dose heparin or Coumadin. The unit is versatile in that blood can be taken from the left atrium, left ventricle, and pumped into the aorta. Right heart support is readily provided by installing the pump to fill from the right atrium and pump blood to the pulmonary artery.

The Novacor system uses biological valves and a highly smooth blood contacting sac. An interesting mechanical design employs pusher plates on the front and the back of the sac insuring excellent washout. Patients with this device are maintained on long-term anticoagulation.

 

NEXT Question | TOP of Page | FAQs HOME | CTSNet HOME


   

3.

What is the status of permanent ventricular assist pumps?

Both the HeartMate electrical system and the Novacor unit were ultimately designed to be used as permanent ventricular assist devices. The opportunity to use these as bridge devices has provided the designers and the surgeons with an opportunity to gain experience with these pumps but without the concerns regarding long-term (greater than one year) reliability . The electrical devices are designed to be implanted in the left upper quadrant, fill from the left ventricle, and eject into the aorta. Both of these systems require vent tubes and electric wires that exit from the lower abdominal skin. Ultimately, energy transfer by inductive coupling techniques can be employed with these devices. Some type of implantable compliance chamber would also be required to eliminate the need for any tube or wire to cross the skin.

Initial clinical use of these devices is just beginning to occur at the present time. With these systems, the patients carry rechargeable battery packs that can be changed at prespecified intervals.

The extreme shortage of donor hearts and the increasing population of patients with ventricular failure suggests that these devices will play a major role in the treatment of patients with end stage heart disease in the future. Since 1990, an average of 2217 heart transplants are performed annually. Estimates suggest that as many as 10,000 patients may be candidates annually for cardiac replacement therapy (heart transplantation, permanent left ventricular assist pumps, and the artificial heart).

 

NEXT Question | TOP of Page | FAQs HOME | CTSNet HOME


   

4.

What is the status of the artificial heart? Does the lack of news during the past decade mean that artificial heart development has stopped?

In the mid 80's, William DeVries, originally at the University of Utah and subsequently at Humana Hospital in Lewisville, implanted pneumatically powered artificial hearts in a small series of patients who were not felt to be transplant candidates. The disadvantage of having two sizable pneumatic tubes exit from the chest wall and the need for the bulky pneumatic power unit led to the recognition that a pneumatic artificial heart was unlikely to serve as an acceptable permanent cardiac substitute.

About one decade ago, the Devices and Technology Branch of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute made funds available for the development of an electrically powered artificial heart. As part of the requirements, the NIH requested that partnerships be established between medical groups and engineering groups that were capable of manufacturing such an artificial heart once the developmental work had been completed. Accordingly, three such groups now exist in the United States and are making excellent progress on artificial heart development. These groups are Abiomed and the Texas Heart Institute, Nimbus, Inc. and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the 3M Company and The Pennsylvania State University. The artificial hearts under development consist of separate pumping chambers for the left and right ventricles. The devices are powered by small, brushless DC motors that either power a hydraulic fluid or directly activate the blood-containing sacs. Energy is to be transmitted by inductive coupling, thus there is no break in the skin and no tubes or wires need to cross the skin. The devices are all placed in the pericardial sac in a fashion similar to that of cardiac transplantation. The anterior abdominal wall is the sit e for the electronic canister, implanted electric battery to provide actuation of the device for 30-40 minutes, and an implanted electrical coil which serves as the secondary coil of a transform repair. The external or primary coil is energized either by conventional house current or by a portable rechargeable battery.

Devices of this general nature have now functioned on the laboratory bench for many months. The details of the control systems have been worked out and animal implantation in calves has been carried out for as long as 13 months. Under the present NIH plan, the device designs will be frozen within the next year. About a dozen of each of the devices will be evaluated for reliability on a mock circulatory loop with continuo us operation for at least one year and hopefully for two years. A series of animal implants will be carried out, again in calves, with the final device.

With the current funding available and the time required for reliability testing and animal implantation testing, it appears that the artificial heart should be ready for initial human testing at the turn of the century.

 

NEXT Question | TOP of Page | FAQs HOME | CTSNet HOME


   

5.

Which patients will be candidates for artificial hearts and which will be candidates for permanent ventricular assist devices?

The simpler of the devices is the ventricular assist device. The blood will be taken from the ventricular apex and the heart will remain in place as a fail safe mechanism, should the ventricular assist pump fail. However, many chronically diseased he arts have thrombus within the left ventricular chamber and will present an ever present risk of thromboembolic complications. Moreover, a valvular disease may be present and lethal arrhythmias may occur. In some patients, right ventricular failure is nearly as prominent as left ventricular failure. In this latter group of patients, cardiectomy and replacement of the entire heart will be the safer and preferred procedure. Experts estimate that approximately 1/3 of the patients who require a permanent mechanical device will be treated with the artificial heart whereas the remaining 2/3 will be able to be adequately treated with a permanent ventricular assist pump.
 

TOP of Page | FAQs HOME | CTSNet HOME



Additional Adult Cardiac Surgery FAQs

* Heart Transplantation
* Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization
* PCTA vs. CABG
* Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty
* Ventricular Assist Devices
* Homografts in Adult Practice
* Surgery for Marfan Disease