Assisted Circulation


View TSDA Curriculum Online for this topic

1. Advanced Mechanical Support
Indications
Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
Post-MI cardiogenic shock
Post-transplant graft failure
High-risk PTCA support
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
Hypothermia rewarming
Alternative to transplantation(clinical trials)

2. Circulatory Support

Mechanical cardiac assist
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
Ventricular assist devices (VAD)
Cardiopulmonary support (CPS, ECMO)

Mechanical cardiac replacement
Total artificial hearts (TAH)

Others
Biologic cardiac assist- cardiomyoplasty
Ventricular remodeling
Pacing

3. Mechanical Circulatory Support- Characterization

Output hemodynamics
Pulsatile
Non-pulsatile

Drive mechanism
Pneumatic; electric (hydraulic, mechanical)

Configuration
TAH, BVAD, RVAD, LVAD

Status/availability
Approved for market, IDE trials, in development

4. Placement position

Orthotopic; heterotopic; extracorporeal
Paracorporal; transcutaneous

Implantability
Fully; partially; not at all

Application/ permanence
Temporary; bridge-to-transplant, cardiogenic shock; bridge-to-recovery
Permanent; alternative-to-transplantation

5. Device Selection for Bridge-to-Transplantation

Criteria LVAD RVAD BVAD TAH
LV failure ++ -- -- +
RV failure -- ++ -- +
LV & BV failure -- -- + +
Unresectable trombus -- -- -- +
S/P mechanical valve -- -- -- +
AI (or PI) -- -- -- +
Irreparable intracardiac shunts -- -- -- +
Uncorrectable arrhythmias ? ? + +
Refractory ischemia, angina -- -- -- +
Transplant heart rejection -- -- -- +
Acute MI at cannula site ? ? ? +
Unresectable cardiac tumor -- -- -- ?

6. Bridge-to-Transplant

Problems
Cardiovascular
Failure on non-supported ventricle
Arrhythmias
Cyanosis/shunting with PFO
Ischemia/angina

Systemic
Hemorrhage
End-organ failure
Infection
Infection
Immune sensitization
Compromised quality of life

Device related
Thromboemboli
Obstruction/compression
Improper orientation
Device infection
Device failure
Hemorrhage
Air entrianment/embolus
Hemolysis

Results
65-75% successfully bridged (90+% possible)
90+% of those transplanted are discharged

7. Mechanical Circulatory Support– Issues for the future

Technological improvements
Size, biocompatibility, control, reliability, power and durability

Clinical effectiveness
Longevity, quality of life, complications, recovery, expertise

Cost-effectiveness
Of technology and implementation

Societal and ethical concerns
Allocation of resources; patient populations

Permanent Implantation– future NEED

By the year 2010
Number or patients: 35,000- 70,000 per year for long-term support
Devices:10,000-20,000 TAH and 25,000-60,000 VAD

By the year 2020
Device reliability exceeds transplant
Number of patient may exceed 200,000 per year
(Ref. Institute of Medicine for NIH, NHLBI)

8. Total Artificial Heart

Results– Bridge-to-transplant
TAH Control
N % N %
Pateints 27 -- 18 --
Transplanted 25 93 8 44
Discharged home 28 89 7 39
Neurologic-embolic 9 33 -- --

Copeland et al

9. Summary

May be life saving in selected patients with end-stage heart disease
Need for this intervention is increasing with decreasing donor availability
May ultimately become an alternative to transplantation