Quantcast
ctsnet Banner
 
 

Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies VII

 
 

SESSION IA

 
     
 
 
 

ABSTRACT 3

MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED MITRAL VALVE REPAIR: MID-TERM FOLLOW UP

P. Schroeyers, F. Wellens, R. DeGeest, I. Degrieck, F. VanPraet, H. Vanermen
Cardiovascular Surgery, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.

Introduction:Video-assisted  Mitral Valve Repair (MVR) through “Port-Access” TM is a valid alternative for mid-sternotomy. Mid-term results are not known yet.

Patients and methods: Between February 1997 and December 1999, 121 consecutive patients underwent mitral valve surgery through a small right antero-lateral thoracotomy using the Heartport® system, 77 patients underwent MVR.  Severe (4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) was seen in 63 patients (82%). Mean NYHA Class was 2,5 ±0,4. Standard Carpentier MVR procedures were used in all patients; 11 had PTFE chordae for anterior leaflet prolapse.

Results: Hospital mortality was 1,3% (n=1). Two patients (2,6%) had conversion to sternotomy for aortic dissection  with the Endo-Aortic Clamp™. Mean cross clamp and mean perfusion time were 103 min. (24-160) and 140 min. (75-215) respectively. At clinical follow-up (19,6 months, range 5-41) all patients improved their NYHA class. At echocardiography, LV end-diastolic and LV end-systolic diameters decreased from 61 ±7,3 to 53± 6,9 (p<0,01) and 37±6,8 to 34±6,9 (p<0,05) respectively. Sixty two pts (88%)  had no or trivial MR and 9 pts (12%) had moderate MR (2+). There were two late valve replacements for endocarditis and no late deaths.

Conclusion: Port-Access™ MVR constitutes a valid alternative to mid-sternotomy with good mid-term results.

 
     
 
 
  [Program & Schedule] [Posters] [Contributors] [Faculty]  
     


CTSNet Search Feedback