Quantcast
ctsnet Banner
 
 

Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies VII

 
 

SESSION II:  High Risk Off-Pump CABG

 
     
 
 
 

ABSTRACT 33

EMERGENCY OFF PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS: SAFETY AND EFFICACY

Daniel P. O’Hair, Leonard H. Kleinman, Paul H. Werner, Thomas P. Barragry, John D. Crouch.   St. Luke’s Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Surgical emergency has previously been considered a contraindication to off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB).  This study compares the outcome of patients undergoing emergency myocardial revascualrization with and without extracorporeal support (CPB).

Forty patients underwent emergency coronary bypass due to acute myocardial infarction (MI), unrelenting angina, cardiogenic shock, or failed PTCA.  The operations were conducted with standard cardiopulmonary bypass in Group 1 (n=19) and as OPCAB in Group 2 (n=21).

Preoperative characteristics show no significant differences between Group 1 (CPB) and Group 2 (OPCAB) in age (65 vs. 69 years), sex (70%m vs. 67%m), ejection fraction (39% vs. 33%), acute MI (90% vs. 95%), or previous CVA (10% vs. 19%). Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump was utilized in 47% of Group 1 and in 52% of Group 2 patients. Patients in Group 1 had 3.3 grafts versus 2.4 in Group 2 (p=NS).  There were no conversions from OPCAB to CPB.

Postoperative complications in Group 1 (CPB) and Group 2 (OPCAB) included prolonged intubation 44% vs. 26%; adverse neurologic events 4/19 (21%) vs. 2/21 (9.5%) and hemodialysis in 3/19 (16%) vs. 1/21 (5%) (p=NS).  Length of stay was 11 days for Group 1 versus 10 days for Group 2.   There were 4 deaths in Group 1 (21%) and 2 in Group 2 (9.5%) (p=NS).

These data suggest that OPCAB is a safe and effective option for patients requiring emergency bypass surgery.

 
     
 
 
  [Program & Schedule] [Posters] [Contributors] [Faculty]  
     


CTSNet Search Feedback