CTSNET Experts' Techniques
General Thoracic Experts'
Techniques
Section Editor: Mark
K. Ferguson, M.D.
| Transhiatal Esophagectomy | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Patient Selection |
|
Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) may be used to treat patients with either benign or malignant esophageal disease because the reconstructive resultcervical esophagogastric anastomosisyields an excellent functional result with a minimum of gastroesophageal reflux. In practice, the majority of patients who require esophagectomy have malignant disease. No single esophagectomy approach is ideally suited for all patients. That is certainly true for the THE technique. With proper patient selection, this approach is safe and very well tolerated. There are two patient selection criteria which should be met before selecting the THE approach. The first is that the portion of esophagus which needs to be blindly, or bluntly mobilized be extrinsically normal. This portion of esophagus is generally a length of about 5-10 cms extending from the distal trachea into the subcarinal region. This region can not be visualized from either the neck or the abdomen and must be mobilized digitally. This is the inferior aspect of the upper mediastinal esophageal space which is quite tight and which is bordered by the airway anteriorly, the aorta and azygos vein laterally, and the vertebral body posteriorly. Grey-Turner described a bloodless plane in the immediate paraesophageal space. Liebermann-Meffert has documented an anatomic explanation for that earlier clinical observation by Grey-Turner. The larger arterial blood supply to the esophagus branches into small capillary arcades approximately 1 cm off the esophageal wall. Dissection within this 'space' disrupts only these smaller vessels which rapidly spasm and thrombose. Dissection outside of this 'space' risks tearing larger vessels which would result in larger blood loss and may require observation and ligation. The first criteria, that the esophagus be externally normal in the region of blunt dissection, means that any pathology which would otherwise prevent you from staying in or accessing this immediate paraesophageal space, is a contraindication for using the THE approach. Previous thoracotomy, especially if the mediastinal pleura was opened, transesophageal inflammatory inflammation as occurs with some ingestion injuries, mid to upper esophageal transmural cancers, all are examples of pathology which prevent access to the safe paraesophageal plane. As mentioned above, the most common indication for esophagectomy is cancer. The fact that adenocarcinoma is the most common esophageal cancer, and that these cancers involve the lower esophagus near the esophagogastric junction, is one of the main factors responsible for the increasing use of the THE approach. Evaluation of the esophagealmediastinal plane is best done by taking a detailed medical history, chest computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound. The second criteria for patient selection is the availability of long-segment esophageal replacement. The THE technique uses a cervical anastomosis and therefore any esophageal replacement conduit must reach to the neck. Generally, this means that there needs to be available stomach or colon. Patients who are particularly thin, even if they meet the criteria above, may not be ideal candidates for THE as blunt dissection in these patients may cause profound hemodynamic compromise. This problem is strictly mechanical, as there simply is not enough room for the surgeon's hand and the heart in thin patients with a narrow A-P diameter of the chest. The most extreme example would be patients with pectus excavatum. Patients who have had previous neck surgery or irradiation, may not be candidates for this technique as the cervical esophagus is not accessible for mobilization and anastomosis. Of note, patients who have undergone prior median sternotomy, as for open heart surgery, remain candidates for THE provided that the above two criteria are met. I have also found that prior PEG tube placement has not prevented gastric mobilization and use. THE with cervical esophageal anastomosis has been shown to result in transient increased tendency for postoperative aspiration. Any patient in which there is any sugestion of preoperative aspiration tendency should have this evaluated by video pharyngoesophagogram. Ipsilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is reported to occur in 5-10% of patients following THE. Therefore, preoperative vocal cord evaluation is indicated in any patient in which there is suspected cord dysfunction preoperatively. Patients with esophageal cancer are staged in a standard fashion. Appropriate evaluation of nutritional status is important before considering any patient for esophagectomy. |
Operative Steps |
|
|
||
Preference Card |
|
Tips and Pitfalls |
|
TIPS
PITFALLS
|
Results |
|
The most common complications after esophagectomy, by any means, are respiratory and anastomotic. Both are seri |