|
Practice patterns of surgical therapy for esophageal cancer
- This esophageal cancer management survey was posted during the months of August and September 2006.
- A total of 145 responses were received, the majority of which were from North American participants.
- Most surgeons recommend induction therapy prior to resection for regionally advanced esophageal cancer. It is interesting to note that over 85% of surgeons felt that they had input into this decision prior to the institution of therapy.
- Resections were performed primarily using open techniques involving a right thoracotomy, but there were at least 4 other techniques that were used with some meaningful frequency.
- About 10% of resections are being performed minimally invasively; this may reflect the specific interests of the respondents rather than representing a general trend towards minimally invasive surgery for this condition.
 |  | | 1. A patient has a T2N1M0 adenocarcinoma of the distal thoracic esophagus. He is a satisfactory risk for esophagectomy. What is your preference for therapy? |
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | | | | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy followed by resection. |
|  | 72.4% | 105 | | | | Resection followed by chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy, even if margins are clear (R0 resection). |
|  | 19.3% | 28 | |  | 6.9% | 10 | | | | Chemotherapy and radiation therapy only. |
|  | 1.4% | 2 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|  |
 |  | | 2. A patient has a T2N1M0 adenocarcinoma of the distal thoracic esophagus. He is a satisfactory risk for esophagectomy. He has not received prior therapy. What is your preferred surgical approach to resection? |
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | | | | Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (2-hole approach; high intrathoracic anastomosis) |
|  | 35.9% | 52 | | | | Modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (3-hole approach; cervical anastomosis) |
|  | 15.9% | 23 | | | | Transhiatal esophagectomy |
|  | 22.1% | 32 | | | | Left thoracotomy for resection and reconstruction |
|  | 6.2% | 9 | | | | Thoracoabdominal approach for resection and reconstruction |
|  | 8.3% | 12 | | | | Minimally invasive or hybrid esophagectomy |
|  | 11% | 16 | |  | 0.7% | 1 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|  |
 |  | | 3. A patient has a T2N1M0 adenocarcinoma of the distal thoracic esophagus. He is a satisfactory risk for esophagectomy. He has received prior therapy including two cycles of 5-FU and cisplatin as well as 50 Gy of radiation therapy, both having been completed 1 month prior to the planned resection. What is your preferred surgical approach to resection? |
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | | | | Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (2-hole approach; high intrathoracic anastomosis) |
|  | 33.1% | 48 | | | | Modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (3-hole approach; cervical anastomosis) |
|  | 20.7% | 30 | | | | Transhiatal esophagectomy |
|  | 18.6% | 27 | | | | Left thoracotomy for resection and reconstruction |
|  | 9% | 13 | | | | Thoracoabdominal approach for resection and reconstruction |
|  | 7.6% | 11 | | | | Minimally invasive or hybrid esophagectomy |
|  | 10.3% | 15 | |  | 0.7% | 1 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|  |
 |  | | 4. Assuming that disease progression has not been documented, does the disease status after neoadjuvant therapy influence your decision to proceed with esophagectomy for a distal thoracic adenocarcinoma originally staged T2N1M0? |
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | | | | No, I proceed with resection whether or not persistent disease is identified. |
|  | 87.6% | 127 | | | | Yes, resection is contraindicated unless persistent disease is identified. |
|  | 5.5% | 8 | | | | Yes, identification of persistent disease is a contraindication to resection. |
|  | 6.9% | 10 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|  |
 |  | | 5. Do you participate directly in the decision to offer neoadjuvant therapy to patients with a T2N1M0 distal thoracic adenocarcinoma?
|
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | | | | Usually not, the decision is typically made prior to my seeing such patients. |
|  | 7.6% | 11 | | | | Usually not, the treatment has usually been completed prior to my seeing such patients. |
|  | 4.8% | 7 | | | | Usually yes, these patients are reviewed with me by referring oncologists. |
|  | 42.1% | 61 | | | | Usually yes, these patients are discussed in a multidisciplinary conference prior to beginning therapy. |
|  | 45.5% | 66 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|  |
 |  | | 6. In what continent do you practice? |
|
|
|
 | | Response Percent | Response Total | |  | 62.8% | 91 | |  | 4.1% | 6 | |  | 20% | 29 | |  | 0.7% | 1 | |  | 11.7% | 17 | |  | 0.7% | 1 | | Total Respondents | 145 | | (skipped this question) | 0 |
|
|  |
|
|