<?xml version="1.0" ?>
	<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		
	<title>CTSNet - Reader Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.ctsnet.org</link>
	<description>CTSNet Reader Comments</description> 
	
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2009 CTSNet</copyright>
	<webMaster>support@ctsnet.org</webMaster>
	
	
	
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.aats.org/home/smadhyapak" target="_blank"><span class="smText">[Adhyapak]</span></a>]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. A.Calafiore,I read your elegant study. The technique of SVR has evolved from mere volume reduction to re shaping the adversely remodeled ventricle. It is understood that the Dor's technique only creates a smaller spherical ventricle with sub optimal hemodynamics. The ellipsoid shape of the LV is a pre requisite for optimal function and clinical outcome. At our centre, we have performed nearly 250 SVR surgeries using a linear endoventricular patch which also results in a near physiological ellipsoid ventricle. The emphasis should shift from mere volume reduction, towards preservation of the physiological ventricular shape. Your study marks a definitive turn in the right direction.-Dr. Srilakshmi.M.Adhyapak</p>]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:00 EDT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	
	</channel>
	</rss>


