<?xml version="1.0" ?>
	<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		
	<title>CTSNet - Reader Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.ctsnet.org</link>
	<description>CTSNet Reader Comments</description> 
	
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2009 CTSNet</copyright>
	<webMaster>support@ctsnet.org</webMaster>
	
	
	
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.aats.org/home/tnitta" target="_blank"><span class="smText">[Nitta]</span></a>]]></title>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an important study that looked at the rationale behind the failure of AF surgery and may wake surgeons to realize the pitfalls and knacks in the procedure. There are several technical options, such as endocardial cryoablation alone, endo- and epicardial cryoablation, direct clamping of the CS with a Bipolar RF device and cryo or RF at the isthmus, for creating a conduction block at the CS/mitral isthmus region. Was there any association with the incidence of failure at the CS/mitral isthmus region and the ablative procedures used to create the lesion?</p>]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 08:31 EDT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	
	</channel>
	</rss>


