|
|
Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Patient
Selection |
 |
| Gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders
in the US today with a prevalence of 360/100,000 people. For
the majority of patients this is a self limited condition that may
be improved with changes in lifestyle or medical therapy. However,
approximately 25% of patients with GERD will develop progressive disease
that does not respond to simple therapy. Some of these patients
may benefit from an antireflux procedure [1-4].
Some basic requirements
for consideration for an antireflux procedure include complications
of esophageal acid exposure such as stricture, Barrett’s esophagus,
and the presence of alkaline reflux. Other indications include
persistent symptoms after 12 weeks of medical therapy and the inability
to continue medical therapy [5,6].
We believe that
all patients should have the following tests prior to surgery [2,4]:
Some Patients
may require:
-
Barium
esophagram
-
Gastric
emptying test
|
 |
 |
 |
Operative
Steps |
 |
| The
patient is placed in a modified lithotomy position with the head of
the table tilted up 25 degrees. The operating surgeon stands between
the patient’s legs while the camera operator stands to the patient’s
right and the second assistant assumes a position on the patient’s
left. Three 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars are placed as shown in
Figure 1. The laparoscope is introduced through
a port placed in the midline superior to the umbilicus. Placing the
5-mm trocars on either side of the midline allows for triangulation
and avoids interference with the camera’s line of vision.
The procedure begins with the
exposure of the esophageal hiatus by the anterior retraction of the
left lateral segment of the liver with a fan retractor. A Babcock
clamp is placed on the esophageal fat pad and retracted toward the
patient’s feet. This exposes the gastrohepatic ligament
and the phrenoesophageal membrane. A standard grasper and hook
cautery are used to incise the gastrohepatic ligament and expose the
right crus.
Care must be taken to identify
and avoid damage to an aberrant left hepatic artery or to the nerve
of Latarjet in the lesser omentum adjacent to the lesser curvature
of the stomach. The dissection is then carried anteriorly until
the left crus is identified.
The careful and complete dissection
of the left crus and the angle of His are critical to developing the
window posterior to the esophagus. The Babcock is repositioned
to the ‘shelf’ of peritoneum which often attaches the
fundus of the stomach to the diaphragm and left crus. Circumferential
blunt dissection of the esophagus at the level of the hiatus will
allow for the anterior retraction of the esophagus with the left hand
dissector, allowing for further posterior dissection of the esophagus.
The posterior ‘window’ is then identified with careful
blunt dissection posterior to the esophagus just anterior and lateral
to the left crus (Figure 2).
|
| 
|

|
| Figure
1: The operating surgeon stands between the patient’s
legs while the camera operator stands to the patient’s
right and the second assistant assumes a position on the patient’s
left. |
Figure 2:
Circumferential blunt dissection of the esophagus at the level
of the hiatus will allow for the anterior retraction of the
esophagus with the left hand dissector, allowing for further
posterior dissection of the esophagus. The posterior
‘window’ is then identified with careful blunt
dissection posterior to the esophagus just anterior and lateral
to the left crus. |
|
| After
the posterior ‘window’ is identified, a space just superior
and medial to the free edge of the left crus is dissected free to
allow for closure of the hiatus. This space is often referred
to as the ‘cave’ (Figure 3). After the
crura have been adequately identified and dissected free for a distance
of 2 to 3 centimeters, the hiatus is closed using from 1 to 4 2-0
Prolene sutures (Figure 4). The esophagus is
retracted anteriorly and to the left as the crura are approximated
beginning at the level of the aortic decussation of the crura.
Further bites are taken in an anterior direction until an adequate
hiatal diameter is attained. This can be measured by placing
a 56 Fr Maloney bougie in the esophagus or can be judged by experience.
The sutures are tied extracorporeally using a standard knot pusher.
Attention is then turned to the short gastric vessels. A Harmonic
scalpel is inserted into the right 5-mm port and a standard grasper
is used to identify the gastrosplenic ligament. The Babcock
is placed laterally to provide further exposure and retraction during
short gastric ligation. The lesser sac is entered approximately
one third of the way down the greater curvature of the stomach and
the dissection is then carried out toward the splenic bed. Division
of the short gastric vessels is assisted by further retraction of
the stomach to the right and the gastric omentum to the left.
With careful dissection, the fundus can be completely mobilized in
most patients (Figure 5).
|
| 
|
 |

|
| Figure
3 : A space just superior to the free edge of the
left crus is dissected free to allow for closure of the hiatus.
This space is often referred to as the ‘cave’.
(Reprinted from Ferguson MK: Atlas of Esophageal Surgery,
in: Digestive Tract Surgery: A Text and Atlas, Bell RH et
al, eds, 1996, Philadelphia, Lippincott William & Wilkins,
p 137, with permission.) |
Figure
4: After the crura have been adequately identified
and dissected free for a distance of 2 to 3 centimeters, the
hiatus is closed using from 1 to 4 2-0 Prolene sutures. |
Figure
5: Using the harmonic scalpel, the short gastric
vessels are divided to mobilize the fundus. (Reprinted
from Townsend et al: Hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux
disease, in Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis
of Modern Surgical Practice, 16th Edition, 2000, Philadelphia,
Saunders, p 761, with permission) |
|
| The
Babcock clamp is then placed into the right most subcostal port and
the clamp is passed into the posterior ‘window’ behind
the esophagus. Graspers are then used to identify a point on
the fundus approximately 15 cm distal to the Angle of His. This
point is then placed into the open Babcock clamp and slowly pulled
behind the esophagus through the ‘window’ (Figure
6). This portion should be released briefly once it
is in position to ensure there is little tension. If it remains
in position it has passed the ‘drop test’.
Attention is then turned to the
angle of His and the ‘disappearing piece’ of the fundus
is identified going behind the esophagus. A clamp is used to
grasp the appropriate portion of the fundus, close to the short gastric
vessels, for the left side of the wrap. This anterior segment is approximated
over the esophagus to the posterior fundus to ensure a snug wrap,
which can be measured over a 56 Fr Maloney bougie or by experience.
The ‘shoe-shine’ maneuver is used to ensure that the fundus
slides freely posterior to the esophagus and is of appropriate length
(Figure 7).
The wrap is then sutured into
place using a single U-stitch of 2-0 Prolene buttressed with Teflon
pledgets tied in an extracorporeal manner (Figure 8). The
stitch incorporates the adjacent muscle layer of the esophagus. Care
is taken not to place this stitch too deeply in the esophagus to avoid
a full thickness injury to the esophagus should the patient retch
after surgery. A 3-0 silk suture is used to further secure
the wrap and is most easily tied intracorporeally (Figure
9). The suture line should lie to the right of the esophagus
when finished. Finally, the abdomen is explored, hemostasis
is assured, and the ports are removed under direct vision.
|
| 
|
 |

|

|
| Figure
6: Graspers are used to identify a point on the fundus
approximately 15 cm distal to the Angle of His. This
point is then placed into the open Babcock clamp and slowly
pulled behind the esophagus through the ‘window’. |
Figure
7: The ‘shoe-shine’ maneuver is used
to ensure that the fundus slides freely posterior to the esophagus
and is of appropriate length. |
Figure
8: The wrap is sutured into place using a single
U-stitch of 2-0 Prolene buttressed with Teflon pledgets tied
in an extracorporeal manner. A 56 Fr Maloney bougie
may be introduced prior to sizing the wrap and is removed
before placing the sutures. |
Figure
9: A 3-0 silk suture is used to further secure
the wrap and is most easily tied intracorporeally. |
|
| Postoperative
Care
Patients are allowed to take
liquids on recovery from anesthesia and are maintained on a diet of
pureed foods for 1-2 weeks. Thereafter they can begin to take soft
foods and go on to a normal diet after 4-6 weeks. Light activity is
encouraged and heavy lifting is avoided for 4 weeks. Analgesia is
given in liquid form for the first two weeks and all pills are crushed.
Most patients are allowed to leave the hospital on the first postoperative
day. |
 |
 |
 |
Preference
Card |
 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
Tips and
Pitfalls |
 |
-
While dividing the gastrohepatic ligament, look for an aberrant
left hepatic artery.
-
The fundus may lie just posterior to the left crus and can
be perforated with blunt dissection of the posterior ‘window’.
-
Only dissect under clear vision. Always know what you
are dividing or dissecting.
-
Care must be taken while suturing the right crus to identify
and avoid damage to the inferior vena cava.
-
Caution should be used while suturing the crura and dissecting
the hiatus as the aorta lies just inferiorly. There are reports
of aortic injury.
-
The spleen may easily be injured while passing the Babcock
posterior to the esophagus and during aggressive short gastric
division.
-
While dividing the short gastric vessels, leave an adequate
margin on the greater curvature to prevent injury to the stomach.
|
 |
 |
 |
Results |
 |
| Laparoscopic
Nissen fundoplication is a well proven therapy for gastroesophageal
reflux disease, with over 90% of patients being highly satisfied on
8 to 10 year follow-up [7,8].
Complications include [9]:
| Wrap herniation |
1.3% |
| Pneumothorax |
1.0% |
| Perforation |
0.8% |
| Hemorrhage |
0.8% |
| Pneumonia |
0.6% |
| Abscess |
0.3% |
| Trochar site hernia
|
0.2% |
| Pulmonary embolus
|
0.2% |
| Splenectomy |
0.1% |
| Myocardial infarction
|
0.1% |
Long-term side effect include
dysphagia in 8%, abdominal bloating in about 10%, and new onset diarrhea
in 14% of patients [8,10,11].
|
 |
 |
 |
References |
 |
|
1. Duranceau A, Jamieson GG. Hiatal
Hernia and Gastroesophageal Reflux. In: Sabiston DC Jr, Lyerly HK,
eds. Textbook of surgery: the biologic basis of modern surgical
practice, 15th ed. Philadelphia. WB Saunders, 1997:767-783
2. Hinder RA, Filipi CJ. Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication.
In: Cameron, JL ed. Current Surgical Therapy, 5th ed. St. Louis.
Mosby, 1995:1063-1069
3. Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen
fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux
disease. Ann
Surg 1994;220:472-481
4. Hinder RA, Libbey JS, Gorecki P, Bammer, T. Antireflux
surgery - indications, preoperative evaluation, and outcome. Gastrointest
Clin N Am 1999;28:987-1005
5. Castell DO, Brunton SA, Earnest DL, Fogel R, Hinder RA, Liss D,
Peters JH, Siegel MM. GERD: Management algorithms for the primary
care physician and the specialist. Practical Gastroenterol 1998;4:18-46
6. Glaser, K; Wetscher, GJ; Klingler, A; Klingler, PJ; Eltschka, B;
Hollinsky, C; et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic antireflux
surgery. Dig
Dis 2000;18:129-137
7. Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A, Klingler PJ. Five to eight year outcome
of the first laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. J
Gastrointest Surg 2001;5:42-47
8. Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Lund RJ, Raiser F, Katada N. Laparoscopic
Nissen fundoplication: where do we stand? Surg
Lap Endosc 1997;7:17-21
9. Carlson MA, Frantzides CT. Complications and results of primary
minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10,735 reported
cases. J
Am Coll Surg 2001;193:428-39
10 Malhi-Chowla N, Gorecki PJ, Bammer T, Achem SR, Hinder RA, DeVault
KR. Dilation after fundoplication: timing, frequency, indications
and outcomes. Gastrointest
Endosc 2002;55:219-23
11. Klaus A, Hinder RA, DeVault KR, Achem SR. Bowel dysfunction after
laparoscopic antireflux surgery: incidence, severity, and clinical
course. Am
J Med 2003;114:6-9
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| The pages comprising Experts'
Techniques: General Thoracic Surgical Techniques were compiled and
edited by Mark K. Ferguson,
M.D. Comments, suggestions, and contributions are welcome. |
| |
|
|