CTSNet SponsorsCTSNet is sponsored in part by an educational grant from

Preparing a Scientific Article

Print   E-Mail  Facebook  Twitter  Sharethis

"Publication of the results of an original scientific study entails producing a manuscript with content that reflects a well-designed, well-executed research question. It is a well-written description of the process, the results, and the wide implications."

—Andrew S. Wechsler, MD, Editor, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Study design

  • Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes research and surgeons. Surgery 1998; 124:477-483.
  • Bonchek LI. Are randomized trials appropriate for evaluating new operations? N Engl J Med 1979; 301:44-45. [Medline]
  • Browner WS. Publishing and Presenting Clinical Research. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1999
  • Clinical Study Design and Methods Terminology: http://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/courses-jmgay/GlossClinStudy.htm
  • Cummings SR, Browner WS, Hulley SB. Conceiving the research question. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, editors.
  • Designing Clinical Research. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1988:12-17.
  • Hall GM. The structure of a scientific paper. 1997; London. British Medical Journal.
  • Hulley SB (Ed). Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers 2001.
  • Norton, JA et al. Surgery, Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. Springer-Verlag 2000.
  • Statistics at Square One: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/collections/statsbk/13.shtml

Statistics

  • Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC Press 1990
  • Altman DG, Dore CJ. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet 1990;335:149-53. [Medline]
  • Bailar JC III, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:266-73. [Medline]
  • Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-9. [Medline]
  • Berger VW, Exner DV. Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1999; 20:319-327. [Medline]
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170. [Free Full Text]
  • Braitman LE. Confidence intervals extract clinically useful information from data. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:296-8. [Medline]
  • Braitman LE. Confidence intervals assess both clinical significance and statistical significance. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:515-7. [Medline]
  • Braitman LE, Davidoff F. Predicting clinical states in individual patients. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:406-12. [Medline]
  • Brown BW, Jr. Statistical controversies in the design of clinical trials. Cont Clin Trials 1980; 1:13-27.
  • Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:201-10. [Medline]
  • Davis CE. Secondary endpoints can be validly analyzed, even if the primary endpoint does not provide clear statistical significance. Controlled Clinical Trials 1997;18:557-560. [Medline]
  • Everitt BS. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics in the medical sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
  • Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 1986;292:746-50. [Medline]
  • Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. BMJ 1986;292:810-2. [Medline]
  • Goodman SN, Berlin JA. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:200-206. [Medline]
  • Johnson AG. Removing bias in surgical trials. BMJ 1997; 314:916-917. [Medline]
  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982.
  • Lang T, Secic M. How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers (Medical Writing and Communication) 1997; Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.
  • Meinert CL. Clinical trials dictionary: terminology and usage recommendations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 1996.
  • Piantadosi S. Clinical trials: a methodologic perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
  • Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven: 1991.
  • Salsburg DS. The religion of statistics as practiced in medical journals. Am Stat 1985;39:220-3.
  • Simon R. Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 1986;105:429-35. [Medline]
  • Wilkinson L. Graphical displays. Stat Methods Med Res 1992;1:3-25. [Medline]
  • Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler HA. Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA 1991;266:93-98. [Abstract]

Publication Date: 16-Aug-2004
Last Modified: 3-Mar-2011

©2012 CTSNet