welcomes you to the new, improved website!Mohamed and Asimakopoulos published a best evidence topic regarding the optimal INR target for patients with mechanical aortic valves. They analyzed a total of 922 studies and identified seven studies suitable for best evidence analysis. With regards to their results, a target INR below the standard INR target of 2-3 in patients without thrombogenic risk factors seems to be safe and did not increase the risk of thromboembolic events.
You are here:
Is It Safe and Effective to Reduce the Target Anticoagulation Range for Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Aortic Valves?
Submitted by: Emily Robinson
Source: Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Source URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaa028
Keywords:
Author(s): Walid Mohamed, George Asimakopoulos
1 Comment
Congratulations to both for bringing up the issue and researching the literature.
I was heavily criticized in the past for maintaining my mAVR patients with an INR
of no more than 2 post-op especially if they received a size 21 and up valve and had a good LV. In my 25 years of practice, I never had any problems with major
bleeding or a malfunctioning valve. I hope this paper will convince and help CT surgeons in managing their patients anticoagulation in the future in a more efficient way.