CTSNet
Published on CTSNet (https://www.ctsnet.org)

An 18-Month Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices [1]

Submitted by erobinson [2] on Fri, 2019-12-13 14:48

The authors analyzed the outcomes of the continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. The study includes 105 patients supported with HM2 (N=54), HM3 (N=25), and HW (N-26). Eighteen-month data suggested that HM3 had a better prognostic and adverse-event profile over other devices.

Source name: 
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Resource link: 
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz268 [3]
Subspecialty(ies): 
Cardiac [4]
Author(s): 
Osnat Itzhaki Ben Zadok, Ben Ben-Avraham, Aviv Shaul, Yoav Hammer, Victor Rubachevski, Dan Aravot, Ran Kornowski, Tuvia Ben-Gal
Taxonomy2018 vocabulary term reference: 
Heart failure [5]
Mechanical circulatory assistance [6]
Source URL:https://www.ctsnet.org/jans/18-month-comparison-clinical-outcomes-between-continuous-flow-left-ventricular-assist-devices

Links
[1] https://www.ctsnet.org/jans/18-month-comparison-clinical-outcomes-between-continuous-flow-left-ventricular-assist-devices [2] https://www.ctsnet.org/home/erobinson [3] https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz268 [4] https://www.ctsnet.org/categories/cardiac [5] https://www.ctsnet.org/taxonomy2018/heart-failure [6] https://www.ctsnet.org/taxonomy2018/mechanical-circulatory-assistance