To begin the construction of the valve, interrupted 4-0 Ethibond sutures are used to sew the base of a freestyle subcoronary valve near the bottom collar of the Valsalva graft, anchoring the valve approximately three to four corrugations from the bottom of the graft and tying each suture after placement. This remaining skirt was used as an additional proximal hemostatic suture line at the time of the composite root replacement.
Next, three 5-0 polypropylene sutures were used to sew the rim of aorta along the cusps of the freestyle valve to the sinus portion of the Valsalva graft. This was the primary hemostatic suture line, performed in a running mattress fashion, analogous to the David root reimplantation technique. Each suture began at the nadir of the sinus and was sewn to the commissural apex, where it could be tied. The finished conduit was then inspected.
In cases of aneurysmal disease, the most common valve size has been 29 mm, while smaller sizes such as 25 mm or 27 mm valves are used more frequently in the setting of non-aneurysmal disease such as TAVR explant, root calcification, or reoperation for patient-prosthesis mismatch.
The authors have previously published their institutional experience with this technique in over 500 patients, with excellent long-term survival and freedom from subsequent aortic valve or root replacement.
References
- Patel PM, Callahan M, Dong A, Wei J, Binongo J, Leshnower B, Chen EP. Clinical Outcomes Using Freestyle Valve-Valsalva Graft Composite Conduit for Aortic Root Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep;114(3):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 11. PMID: 35031292.
Disclaimer
The information and views presented on CTSNet.org represent the views of the authors and contributors of the material and not of CTSNet. Please review our full disclaimer page here.
600 views on Vimeo
2 Comments
Nice video and technique. Just a couple of questions. I truly want to understand what is the main purpose of all this work during the procedure when we have available in the market pre-assembled, ready-to-implant valved conduit with RESILIA tissue (Konect valve) or even what is the main difference with classic bioBentall with bioprosthesis with outstanding long-term results such as Magna for instance? What is the advantage? to avoid PPM? I was thinking about the price, but the Valsalva graft is not cheap, and neither is the freestyle valve. Can you clarify this? Thank you very much
I have the same question!