ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

The Atrium: Pleural Sepsis

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

In this episode of The Atrium, host Dr. Alice Copperwheat speaks with Professor Eric Lim, Professor of Thoracic Surgery at Imperial College London and Consultant Thoracic Surgeon at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London, UK, about pleural sepsis.  

They provide an overview of pleural sepsis, highlighting its three stages: the exudative stage, fibrinopurulent stage, and organizing stage. The discussion covers its history and causes, including complications from pneumonia. They also examine symptoms, failure to progress, and imaging techniques such as ultrasound. Additionally, they delve into pleural fluid analysis, the RAPID score, and management strategies, including medical interventions, chest tube drainage, and intrapleural fibrinolytics. Various surgical management strategies are discussed as well, including thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and robotic approaches. Finally, they address chest tube management, respiratory physiotherapy, acute complications, and long-term complications.   

The Atrium is a monthly podcast presenting clinical and career-focused topics for residents and early career professionals across all cardiothoracic surgery subspecialties. Keep an eye out for next month’s episode.  


Disclaimer

The information and views presented on CTSNet.org represent the views of the authors and contributors of the material and not of CTSNet. Please review our full disclaimer page here.

Comments

After a 33-year humbling experience treating empyema thoracis at a county hospital, I thought I had witnessed almost all there was to see about empyema diagnosis & treatment. Ours was one of the first randomized trials of VATS vs. fibrinolytic therapy, published in 1997 [Wait MA, Sharma S, Hohn J, Dal-Nogare A. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest 1997;111(6):1548-1551.] and set the stage for empyema management until the MIST trials started. MIST-1 showed no benefit of SK added to simple chest tube in 2005; MIST-2 treated "pleural infection" with remarkable success and a surprisingly low need for surgical referral, including in the drainage plus placebo group, in 2011. MIST-3 trial showed "equivalent" hospital LOS between VATS and fibrinolytic therapy, even though VATS wasn't undertaken for an average of 3 days from referral; QUALY was used as another primary endpoint, highlighting the inadequacies of MIST-3: acute care general thoracic surgery had apparently fallen out of favor, and QUALY became a substitute therapeutic endpoint, supplanting radiographic & functional endpoints of empyema cure. MIST-4 will evaluate single-port VATS debridement & drainage with decortication avoidance as a plausible therapy for empyema. Anyone well-versed with major decortications of fungal or TB empyema, chronically entrapped lung, failed robotic empyema surgery, or who ever had to resort to rib resection/empyema tube or Eloesser flap or any other thoracoplasty technique will rapidly realize that the outcome hinges on the selection bias and on how clinically relevant the endpoints which are being studied have been defined. My prediction is MIST-4 will demonstrate what we did in '97: the superiority of early VATS debridement/decortication/drainage...so long as the general thoracic surgeons embrace the urgency of acute care general thoracic surgery and treat empyema thoracis with the same sense of urgency that a general surgeon would an empyema of the gallbladder, a neurosurgeon a subdural empyema, or a urologist an empyema of the bladder. I hope MIST-4 will embrace some robust metrics of success, especially those focused on complete lung expansion without significant compromise of lung volume.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments