Skip to content

Welcome to the new

READ MORE
Not a member yet? Register now.
  • ABOUT
    • Leadership
    • Participation
    • Featured Sponsors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Community
      • Volunteer
      • Badges
    • Contact Us
  • EXPLORE CTSNET
    • CARDIAC
    • THORACIC
    • CONGENITAL
    • Clinical Care Professionals
    • JANS
    • Events
    • Journals
  • Videos
    • Atlas of Cardiac Surgery
    • Webinars
    • Guest Interviews
    • Conference Sessions
  • Podcasts
    • The Beat With Joel Dunning
    • The Atrium
    • The Cardiac Recovery Room
    • The Lifeline
  • Profiles
    • Users Directory
    • Organizations
  • CAREERS
    • US Career Center
    • European Career Center
  • ABOUT
    • Leadership
    • Participation
    • Featured Sponsors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Community
      • Volunteer
      • Badges
    • Contact Us
  • EXPLORE CTSNET
    • CARDIAC
    • THORACIC
    • CONGENITAL
    • Clinical Care Professionals
    • JANS
    • Events
    • Journals
  • Videos
    • Atlas of Cardiac Surgery
    • Webinars
    • Guest Interviews
    • Conference Sessions
  • Podcasts
    • The Beat With Joel Dunning
    • The Atrium
    • The Cardiac Recovery Room
    • The Lifeline
  • Profiles
    • Users Directory
    • Organizations
  • CAREERS
    • US Career Center
    • European Career Center
SUBMIT CONTENT
DONATE
JOIN

welcomes you to the new, improved website!

READ MORE
  • ABOUT
    • Leadership
    • Participation
    • Featured Sponsors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Community
      • Volunteer
      • Badges
    • Contact Us
  • EXPLORE CTSNET
    • CARDIAC
    • THORACIC
    • CONGENITAL
    • Clinical Care Professionals
    • JANS
    • Events
    • Journals
  • Videos
    • Atlas of Cardiac Surgery
    • Webinars
    • Guest Interviews
    • Conference Sessions
  • Podcasts
    • The Beat With Joel Dunning
    • The Atrium
    • The Cardiac Recovery Room
    • The Lifeline
  • Profiles
    • Users Directory
    • Organizations
  • CAREERS
    • US Career Center
    • European Career Center
Not a member yet? Register now.
  • ABOUT
    • Leadership
    • Participation
    • Featured Sponsors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Community
      • Volunteer
      • Badges
    • Contact Us
  • EXPLORE CTSNET
    • CARDIAC
    • THORACIC
    • CONGENITAL
    • Clinical Care Professionals
    • JANS
    • Events
    • Journals
  • Videos
    • Atlas of Cardiac Surgery
    • Webinars
    • Guest Interviews
    • Conference Sessions
  • Podcasts
    • The Beat With Joel Dunning
    • The Atrium
    • The Cardiac Recovery Room
    • The Lifeline
  • Profiles
    • Users Directory
    • Organizations
  • CAREERS
    • US Career Center
    • European Career Center
  • ABOUT
    • Leadership
    • Participation
    • Featured Sponsors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Community
      • Volunteer
      • Badges
    • Contact Us
  • EXPLORE CTSNET
    • CARDIAC
    • THORACIC
    • CONGENITAL
    • Clinical Care Professionals
    • JANS
    • Events
    • Journals
  • Videos
    • Atlas of Cardiac Surgery
    • Webinars
    • Guest Interviews
    • Conference Sessions
  • Podcasts
    • The Beat With Joel Dunning
    • The Atrium
    • The Cardiac Recovery Room
    • The Lifeline
  • Profiles
    • Users Directory
    • Organizations
  • CAREERS
    • US Career Center
    • European Career Center
SUBMIT CONTENT
DONATE
JOIN

Mechanical Versus Biological Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50-70 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • April 2, 2026

Submitted by: Jason Trevis

Source: Heart
Source URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41850787/

Keywords:

  • Cardiac
Author(s): Jason Trevis, Jeremy Cheong, Chris Wilkinson, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Rebecca Maier, David Austin, Enoch Akowuah

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years, including 30 studies and more than 120,000 patients.  The findings indicated that mechanical valves were associated with improved long-term survival (approximately 12 percent relative reduction in mortality) compared with bioprosthetic valves. Stroke rates were similar between the groups. However, mechanical valves had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding, reflecting the need for lifelong anticoagulation, while bioprosthetic valves were associated with substantially higher reoperation rates due to structural valve degeneration.  The evidence base was predominantly observational, with only one randomized trial, limiting causal inference. Despite this, international practice is shifting toward increased use of bioprosthetic valves in this age group, likely driven by patient preference and evolving transcatheter options, but without robust long-term randomized evidence to support this trend. 

1 Comment

  1. Michael Wait says:
    April 3, 2026 at 4:59 pm

    If you used only On-X valves for the mechanical AoV replacement cohort, I suspect that the increased incidence of major bleeding would disappear, given that the PROACT trial demonstrated that On-X in aortic position, even in patients with atrial fibrillation, could safely maintain INR at 1.5. In the 50-70 yr.age group, a significant number of bioprosthetic valve recipients are either already on VKA or NOAC/DOAC preoperatively, or soon to be postoperatively due to AFib alone. Many surgeons adhere blindly to the IFR in the bioprosthetic valves for 90 days of anticoagulation at INR 2.5 range, even though it is a practice unsupported by EBM.

     Log in to Reply

Add Comments Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Register now.
ADD TO PLAYLIST
REMOVE FROM PLAYLIST
TAGS
  • Aortic Surgery
  • Aortic Valve
  • valve

Related Content

233 S. Wacker Drive | Suite 4400
Chicago, Illinois 60606, USA

Linkedin X-twitter Facebook-f Youtube
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet

233 S. Wacker Drive | Suite 4400
Chicago, Illinois 60606, USA

Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Facebook-f Youtube
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet

233 S. Wacker Drive | Suite 4400
Chicago, Illinois 60606, USA

Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Facebook-f Youtube
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Join CTSNet
  • Donate
  • Submit Content
  • Volunteer
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • Featured Partners
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Advertise on CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
  • CTSNet Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact CTSNet
© 2026 CTSNet Inc. All right reserved.
Go to Top