Feasibility of Repeat TAVR After SAPIEN 3 TAVR: A Novel Classification Scheme and Pilot Angiographic Study [1]
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expanding to younger patients, but the feasibility of TAVR in failing transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) remains unknown. Dr Tang and colleagues demonstrate in a retrospective review of 551 TAVR procedures by evaluating the postdeployment aortogram using a novel aortic root anatomic classification that TAV-in-TAV after Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) TAVR may not be feasible in >20% of S3 TAVR procedures and in >50% among patients with type 3 roots.
Unique challenges for TAV-in-TAV compared to surgical aortic valve replacement: (1) the native aortic valve leaflets remain in situ after the initial TAVR, acting as a barrier facing the LM orifice; (2) there is currently no predictable way to align the TAV neocommissures with native commissures; (3) often the only way to engage the left main coronary artery is from the TAV stent frame.
This is particularly important given the potential expansion of TAVR to low-risk and/or younger patients who may need redo TAVR. The ascertainment of aortic root type, STJ and SH relative to TVH is essential to guide valve selection and positioning for TAV-in-TAV feasibility on the basis of left main coronary artery obstruction risk.