This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Cardiac Surgery Healthcare Professionals’ Engagement in Research at the Bedside: Challenges and Opportunities

Thursday, April 20, 2023

Fredericks S. Cardiac Surgery Healthcare Professionals’ Engagement in Research at the Bedside: Challenges and Opportunities. April 2023. doi:10.25373/ctsnet.22665550.v1

This article is part of CTSNet’s Guest Editor Series, CONNECTING Patients, Clinicians, and Outstanding Cardiac Care Through Nursing and Allied Professional Research. Guest editors Jill Ley and Tara Bartley have curated a robust collection of content that shares the knowledge, techniques, and insights of several distinguished experts from around the world. 

The increased emphasis on evidence-based practice in healthcare has led to a move of hospital-based nurse education into higher education institutions. This has led to a need for a significant shift in focus on educational training from imparting research contents to providing opportunities to experience the research process.

Research was introduced in the nursing curriculum to increase awareness of research and capacity building to promote research output. Such strong emphasis on teaching and developing research in nursing programs was at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels and is evident in many parts of the world. Within clinical practice, nurses' input in generating research evidence has also been encouraged by the introduction of advanced nurse practitioner roles. Despite these efforts to increase opportunities for research participation, there has been a general lack of research to guide practice. Complex organizational issues and lack of funding, protected time for research, and educational supports have been identified as specific challenges to the engagement in research at the bedside.

Strategies to promote engagement in research include mentorship; collaboration between researchers, academics, and clinicians; role modelling, facilitation, and support; increased awareness of supports for research engagement; cultivating a positive attitude toward research in the clinical environment; and securing time for clinicians to undertake research.


  1. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Theory, research, and practice in health behavior and health education.
  2. Jones, D. W., Peterson, E. D., Bonow, R. O., Masoudi, F. A., Fonarow, G. C., Smith Jr, S. C., ... & Gibbons, R. J. (2008). Translating research into practice for healthcare providers: the American Heart Association’s strategy for building healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Circulation, 118(6), 687-696.
  3. Nilsen, Per. "Brief alcohol intervention—where to from here? Challenges remain for research and practice." Addiction 105, no. 6 (2010): 954-959.
  4. Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2006). Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (3).
  5. Nutbeam, D. (1996). Achieving ‘best practice’in health promotion: improving the fit between research and practice. Health Education Research, 11(3), 317-326.
  6. Veil, S., Reynolds, B., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2008). CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health promotion practice, 9(4_suppl), 26S-34S.


The information and views presented on represent the views of the authors and contributors of the material and not of CTSNet. Please review our full disclaimer page here.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments