ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Robotic Assisted Repair of Large Iatrogenic Tracheal Laceration with ECMO Support

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

Brito JMLT de, Junior O, Saliba G, et al. Robotic Assisted Repair of Large Iatrogenic Tracheal Laceration with ECMO Support. November 2022. doi:10.25373/ctsnet.21568212.v1

Postintubation tracheal laceration (PITL) remains a challenging and rare, yet persistent, problem around the world. It has increased in incidence, previously about 0.005 percent to currently almost 0.48 percent, related to the epidemic of SARS-CoV-2 (1,2). Although bronchoscopic management with tube placement might be effective in some cases, for some patients with ventilatory issues and clinical instability, surgical repair emerges as the definitive treatment. This video describes the use of a robotic platform combined with veno-venous ECMO as an excellent option to avoid major surgical trauma and improve surgical results in a severe PITL.

 

 

The Patient

The patient in this case is an eighty-three-year-old women who is obese and has hypertension, and a palliative performance scale (PPS) score of 90 percent (3). The patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 by RT-PCR test. After ten days from the onset of symptoms, she had respiratory failure requiring orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilatory support. She developed subcutaneous emphysema, initially cervical but with rapid progression to universal distribution with tension, and had ventilatory instability. Bronchoscopic findings confirmed the presence of PITL. She was transferred to the hospital where the surgery was eventually performed. Endoscopic evaluation showed a 6 cm transmural lesion of the posterior wall of the trachea, grade IIIA of Cardillo (4), from the middle third of the trachea to the left main bronchus. No tracheoesophageal fistula was observed.|

Next, a multidisciplinary board discussed the case. Because of the complex tracheal laceration, high ventilatory parameters, progressive and massive subcutaneous emphysema, formerly functional capacity, and age-related frailty, it was decided to perform a minimally invasive robotic assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with the support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy.

The Surgery

The patient was submitted to a veno-venous ECMO. Cannulas were inserted in the groin bilaterally because of subcutaneous emphysema—the right femoral vein for drainage and the left vein for return. After twelve hours of stability with improvement in blood gases, the RATS repair of the trachea was performed using the Da Vinci Xi® surgical platform with four 8 mm ports for the robotic arms and one 15 mm port for the assistant using a right-side approach.

The surgery began by opening the mediastinal pleura, then dissecting and stapling the azygos vein for better exposure of the entire posterior wall of the trachea and carina. After clearing small mediastinal collections, esophagus isolation, and correct identification of the entire lesion with bronchoscopy assistance, the repair was performed with running suture with 3.0 Stratafix® on the trachea and interrupted suture with 4.0 PDS® on the left main bronchus. There were no complications and no air leak in this process. The use of CO2 to keep the pneumothorax during the procedure with open airways was safe and did not cause hypercapnia. Because of the underlying cause and the intubation time, a percutaneous guided tracheostomy was performed at the same time. Owing to satisfactory ventilation parameters and good autonomy, ECMO was withdrawn at the end of the surgical procedure.

The patient had a gradual and favorable recovery with intensive clinical care, antibiotics, and progressive respiratory improvement. Her tracheostomy site was decannulated thirty-six days after surgery, and she was discharged home on the forty-seventh day.

Conclusion

PITL is a rare condition that requires individualized decision making. Obesity, old age, and female sex are the most important risk factors (5,6). There is some consensus for surgical repair in grade IIIA lacerations with progressive emphysema and respiratory failure. The decision to move forward with a surgical approach depends on the location and extent of the lesion, usually with large thoracotomies to access the entire trachea. However, this is associated with major surgical trauma, and ventilation during the surgery requires intermittent apnea, which is challenging. Endobronchial repair can also be performed but demands technical skills, intermittent apnea, and adequate instruments (7). 

Therefore, ECMO support and the robotic platform allow surgeons to safely maintain oxygenation during the procedure and perform a minimally invasive, complete, and safe tracheal reconstruction (8,9). This ensures all the benefits of RATS, such as less postoperative pain, pneumonia, and atelectasis, along with all the reduced perioperative changes in acute phase of immunological and hormonal responses (10–12).


References

  1. Miñambres E, Burón J, Ballesteros MA, Llorca J, Muñoz P, González-Castro A. Tracheal rupture after endotracheal intubation: a literature systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):1056–62.
  2. Brito J, Gregório P, Mariani A, D’ambrosio P, Filho M, Ferreira L, et al. Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 disease: Outcomes and relation to the Macklin effect. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Jul;29(6):541–8.
  3. Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N. Palliative Performance Scale (PPS): A New Tool. J Palliat Care. 1996 Mar;12(1):5–11.
  4. Cardillo G, Carbone L, Carleo F, Batzella S, Jacono RD, Lucantoni G, et al. Tracheal lacerations after endotracheal intubation: a proposed morphological classification to guide non-surgical treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Mar;37(3):581–7.
  5. Grewal HS, Dangayach NS, Ahmad U, Ghosh S, Gildea T, Mehta AC. Treatment of tracheobronchial injuries. Chest. 2019 Mar;155(3):595–604.
  6. Abou-Arab O, Huette P, Berna P, Mahjoub Y. Tracheal trauma after difficult airway management in morbidly obese patients with COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e168–70.
  7. da Silva Costa A, Juliano Perfeito JA, Succi JE, Villaça Leão LE, Rymkiewicz E, da Matta CAS, et al. A video-assisted endotracheal suture technique for correction of distal tracheal laceration after intubation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6):2073–5.
  8. Hawkins RB, Thiele EL, Huffmyer J, Bechtel A, Yount KW, Martin LW. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for management of iatrogenic distal tracheal tear. JTCVS Tech. 2020 Dec;4:389–91.
  9. Sian K, McAllister B, Brady P. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in the delayed surgical repair of a tracheal injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):338–40.
  10. Chan JWY, Yu PSY, Yang JH, Yuan EQ, Jia H, Peng J, et al. Surgical access trauma following minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;58(Supplement_1):i6–13.
  11. Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Sep;20(3):455–63.
  12. Herrmann D, Volmerig J, Al-Turki A, Braun M, Herrmann A, Ewig S, et al. Does less surgical trauma result in better outcome in management of iatrogenic tracheobronchial laceration? J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):4772–81.

Disclaimer

The information and views presented on CTSNet.org represent the views of the authors and contributors of the material and not of CTSNet. Please review our full disclaimer page here.

Comments

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments