ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

A Multi-Institutional Study on the Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Author(s)

Lucy Nam, Ruby Singh, Sameer A. Hirji, Vivian Nguyen, Asishana A. Osho, Arminder S. Jassar, Sary F. Aranki, David A. D’Alessandro, Thoralf M. Sundt, Jordan P. Bloom

This multi-institutional study analyzed 10,607 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement between 2002 and 2023 to assess the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). PPM was present in 22 percent of patients at a moderate level (effective orifice area indexed [EOAi] ≤0.85 cm²/m²) and in 2 percent at a severe level (EOAi ≤0.65 cm²/m²), while 76 percent had no PPM. Over the last decade, the prevalence of PPM declined from 31 percent to 18 percent (P < 0.05), coinciding with an increase in average valve size from 23 mm to 24 mm and a rise in annular enlargement procedures from 2.4 percent to 6 percent (both P < .05). PPM was significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.46; 95 percent CI, 1.13–1.88) and worse long-term survival. Age- and sex-stratified analysis revealed a stronger association between advanced age and PPM risk in women compared to men (odds ratio, 2.31 vs 1.66 for age >74 vs <65 years; both P < .05). In conclusion, while the prevalence of PPM has declined due to technical improvements and evolving patient selection, it remains a significant predictor of adverse outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of tailored surgical strategies, particularly in older female patients. 

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments