ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

A systematic review of minimally invasive surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation: a comparison of the Cox-Maze procedure, beating-heart epicardial ablation, and the hybrid procedure on safety and efficacy

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Submitted by

Source

Source Name: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

Author(s)

Hyung Gon Je, Deborah J. Shuman, and Niv Ad

This systematic review compares three minimally invasive techniques for surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: the endocardial Cox-Maze procedure, epicardial surgical ablation and an epicardial surgical and catheter-based endocardial ablation hybrid procedure. According to this analysis, the Cox-Maze procedure is the most effective one and has important safety advantages.

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments