This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Critical Outcomes in Nonrobotic vs Robotic-Assisted Cardiac Surgery

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Submitted by


Franz Yanagawa; Martin Perez; Ted Bell; Rod Grim; Jennifer Martin; Vanita Ahuja

Outcomes of robotic vs nonrobotic cardiac surgery were evaluated using 1:2 propensity score matching of patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.  Operations included valves/septae (10%), coronary arteries (47%), and other.  Mean costs were 7.5% higher for robotic cases.  Robotic procedures had shorter length of stay (5 vs 6 days), lower mortality (1.0% vs 1.9%), and fewer complications (27% vs 30%).

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments