ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Journal and News Scan

Source: JACC: Case Reports
Author(s): Ahmed K. Awad, Andrew Tang, Gösta B. Pettersson, Marijan Koprivanac, Faisal G. Bakaeen

This case report describes a 62-year-old man with exertional dyspnea due to a massive, serpentine right coronary artery aneurysm with fistulization to the coronary sinus, causing significant left-to-right shunt and right heart dilation. Given the large size and complex anatomy, transcatheter closure was deemed unsuitable. The team performed complete aneurysm unroofing, fistula ligation, and comprehensive revascularization using a reversed saphenous vein graft to construct a neo–right coronary artery with eight sequential bypasses. Postoperative imaging confirmed patent grafts and normalized anatomy. At one-year post-surgery, the patient remained asymptomatic. 

Source: The Washington Post
Author(s): Maggie Penman

Mesfin Yana Dollar, who received life-saving heart surgery as a teenager in the United States, now collaborates with Dr. Jim Kauten, the surgeon who saved him, as a cardiac perfusionist at the Mayo Clinic. Together, they perform advanced open-heart surgeries and participate in medical missions to help patients in Ethiopia.  

Source: JTCVS Structural and Endovascular
Author(s): Katelyn Monaghan, Marc Titsworth, Divyaam Satija, Bahar Masoudian, China Green, Aditya Sridhar, Gorav Ailawadi, Shinichi Fukuhara, Himanshu Patel, Barbara Hamilton, G.Michael Deeb, Bo Yang

This comparative study evaluated outcomes between surgical aortic valve replacement with Y-incision aortic annular enlargement (SAVR with Y-AAE) vs transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in 362 low-to-intermediate risk patients with severe native aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli (≤25mm). The Y-AAE technique allowed upsizing by three to four valve sizes (median size 29) compared to standard TAVR sizing. SAVR with Y-AAE demonstrated significantly superior hemodynamics outcomes at 24 to 36 months, including a larger effective orifice area (2.7 vs 1.9 cm²), lower mean gradients (5 vs 9.5 mmHg), no prosthesis-patient mismatch (0 percent vs 20.1 percent), minimal aortic insufficiency (3.0 percent vs 26 percent), and greater left ventricular mass regression (42 percent vs 22 percent). Operative mortality rates were similar (0 percent vs 2 percent), while pacemaker requirements were lower (1.4 percent vs 10.3 percent). Three-year survival favored SAVR with Y-AAE (98 percent vs 79 percent, p<0.01). The authors conclude that SAVR with Y-incision annular enlargement should be considered for low-to-intermediate risk aortic stenosis patients given its excellent hemodynamics and potential for improved valve longevity. 

Source: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Author(s): Yuki Ikeno, Adrian Ramirez, Muhammad A. Khan, Michael J. Troncone, Harleen Sandhu, Charles C. Miller, Hazim J. Safi, Anthony L. Estrera, Akiko Tanaka

This retrospective study from a high-volume aortic center examined the surgical outcomes of endograft infection following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) over a 35-year period. Among 2,220 patients undergoing descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair, 20 (0.9 percent) required surgery for endograft infection. Of these, eight had endograft infection; seven presented with aortoesophageal fistula, and five with aortobronchial fistulas. The surgical approach involved endograft explantation (95 percent), in-situ reconstruction with rifampin-soaked Dacron grafts, and soft tissue flap coverage (80 percent). Operative mortality was 30 percent, with minimal neurologic complications. One- and five-year survival rates were 43.5 percent and 36.3 percent, respectively. These results compare favorably to conservative management and support the continued use of aggressive surgical intervention—including radical debridement, endograft removal, and tissue coverage—in appropriately selected patients with this challenging complication. 

Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Michael E. Ibrahim, Omar Toubat, Alexandra E. Sperry, Levi Bonnell, Christian Elenbaas, Isao Anzai, Paul N. Fiorilli, Robert O. Bonow, Robert L. Smith, Robert H. Habib, Michael A. Acker, Wilson Y. Szeto

This study evaluated the outcomes of mitral valve re-repair vs replacement after failed primary mitral regurgitation repair. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database was queried, and 1,749 reoperations after failed mitral repair for degenerative regurgitation were identified: 410 re-repairs (23.4 percent) and 1,339 replacements (76.6 percent). Re-repair demonstrated superior intermediate-term survival compared to replacement (adjusted HR 1.96, p=0.022), with lower postoperative morbidity (6.8 percent vs 11 percent, p=0.042). Factors favoring re-repair included younger age, fewer comorbidities, reintervention within two years, and posterior leaflet pathology. The authors concluded that mitral re-repair offers significant survival advantages over replacement in appropriately selected patients, suggesting it should be preferentially pursued at expert centers when anatomically feasible for recurrent degenerative mitral regurgitation. 

Source: Health Technology Assessment
Author(s): Enoch F. Akowuah, Rebecca H. Maier, Helen C. Hancock, Janelle Wagnild, Luke Vale, Cristina Fernandez-Garcia, Ehsan Kharati, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Ayesha Mathias, Zoe Walmsley, Nicola Howe, Richard Graham, Karen Ainsworth, Joseph Zacharias

The UK Mini Mitral Trial compared minimally invasive (Mini) mitral valve repair (MVr) to conventional sternotomy in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. The primary objective was to assess physical function (PF) recovery, using the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2) PF scale 12 weeks post-surgery. The trial found no significant difference in PF between the two approaches. Although the Mini approach was more costly, it had higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a low probability of being cost-effective compared to sternotomy. Both groups had high valve repair rates and low recurrent mitral regurgitation. Hospital stay was shorter for the Mini approach, with a higher proportion of early discharges. Safety outcomes were similar across both procedures. The trial suggests that the Mini approach offers durable repairs with comparable safety but no clear advantage in PF recovery. 

Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Wilson Y. Szeto, Shinichi Fukuhara, Fernando Fleischman, Ibrahim Sultan, William Brinkman, George Arnaoutakis, Hiroo Takayama, Kyle Eudailey, Arminder Jassar, Michael C. Moon

The PERSEVERE study evaluated one-year outcomes of the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis for acute DeBakey Type I aortic dissection with malperfusion. This prospective, single-arm trial enrolled 93 patients across 26 US sites between July 2022 and May 2023. Primary endpoints included major adverse events including mortality, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, myocardial infarction, and distal anastomotic new entry tears (DANE). Through one-year, mortality was 20.4 percent (compared to 42.7 percent in the reference cohort), with minimal events occurring beyond 30 days and no postoperative DANE tears. Secondary outcomes showed 96 percent freedom from unanticipated aortic reoperation and 100 percent arch patency. Positive aortic remodeling demonstrated total aortic diameter stabilization (100 percent in Zone 1, 98 percent in Zone 2, and 73 percent in Zone 3), true lumen expansion (96 percent, 94 percent, and 70 percent respectively), and false lumen thrombosis (91 percent, 92 percent, and 88 percent respectively). The authors conclude that the AMDS device provides encouraging outcomes with reduced mortality and favorable aortic remodeling in this high-risk population. 

Source: BMC Surgery
Author(s): Kai Yang, Chen Wang, Qi Wang, Yongzhi Liu, Wei Cao, Jinlong Zhang, Haochi Li, Dacheng Jin, Yunjiu Gou

This meta-analysis examined 2,732 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax undergoing bullectomy combined with either parietal pleurectomy (PP) or pleural abrasion (PA). Compared with pleural abrasion, parietal pleurectomy was associated with a significantly lower long-term recurrence rate of pneumothorax (odds ratio 0.56, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.77). However, pleurectomy carried a higher perioperative burden: longer operative times (mean difference of approximately 16 minutes), greater intraoperative blood loss, higher postoperative drainage volume, longer chest-tube drainage duration, and longer hospital stays. Importantly, postoperative pain scores were comparable between the two procedures. For cardiothoracic and thoracic surgeons worldwide, this meta-analysis provides the most up-to-date pooled evidence comparing two common pleurodesis techniques in spontaneous pneumothorax surgery. It underscores a clear trade-off: parietal pleurectomy offers better long-term protection against recurrence, but at the cost of increased perioperative morbidity. These insights are highly relevant when tailoring surgical strategy, especially in patients with recurrent pneumothorax, complex bullous disease, or comorbidities, balancing recurrence risk against recovery burden and safety. 

Source: JACC Journals 
Author(s): Ruben W. de Winter, Roel Hoek, Simon J. Walsh, Colm G. Hanratty, Ralf W. Sprengers, Jos W. R. Twisk, Iris Vegting, Stefan P. Schumacher, Michiel J. Bom, Niels J. Verouden, José P. Henriques, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Michele M. Viscusi, Koen Teeuwen, Maksymilian P. Opolski, Rafał Wolny, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Bas E. Schölzel, Adriaan O. Kraaijeveld, Robert-Jan M. van Geuns, Maurits T. Dirksen, Antonius A.C.M. Heestermans, Jo Dens, Johan Bennett, Steven E. F. Haine, Ronak Delewi, Alexander Nap, James C. Spratt, Paul Knaapen

The PROCTOR trial randomized 220 post-coronary artery bypass grafting patients with saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure to native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=108) or SVG PCI (n=112). At one-year, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 34 percent with native PCI vs 19 percent with SVG PCI (HR 2.14; P=0.006). Nonfatal target-territory myocardial infarction (MI) was higher with native PCI (HR 2.12; P=0.029), as was repeat revascularization (HR 2.19; P=0.044). PCI-related MI occurred in 13 percent with native PCI and one percent with SVG PCI (HR 14.85; P=0.009). All-cause mortality did not differ (HR 1.59; P=0.472). SVG PCI produced significantly better one-year outcomes. 

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Sigrid Sandner, Aina Hirofuji, Polina Mantaj, Antonino Di Franco, Mohamed Rahouma, Alexander Gregg, Katherine Krieger, Michelle Demetres, Mario Gaudino

This meta-analysis of eight randomized clinical trials (RCT) compared no-touch (NT) vs conventional (CON) saphenous vein (SV) harvesting in coronary bypass surgery. At a 3.7-year follow-up, NT-SV harvesting showed significantly lower graft failure rates compared to CON-SV. However, mortality and major adverse cardiac events were similar between groups. NT-SV harvesting was associated with higher leg wound complications. The author’s conclusion was that NT-SV harvesting reduces graft failure but increases wound complications; thus, strategies to mitigate harvest-site complications are needed. 

Pages