ALERT!
This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).
Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.
Journal and News Scan
This murine model study investigated a novel combination treatment for pleural mesothelioma using intracavitary cisplatin-fibrin gel (cis-fib) and adjuvant irradiation (IR). Conducted on an orthotopic immunocompetent rat model, the study demonstrates that the combination therapy significantly delayed tumor growth compared to single treatments. A 20 Gy dose of irradiation combined with cis-fib showed the most pronounced effect, reducing tumor growth by up to 71 percent compared to controls. Importantly, the treatment was well-tolerated, with only transient side effects such as mild weight loss and reduced lymphocyte counts observed after irradiation. The current approach to mesothelioma treatment is not straightforward, and while some advocate for purely non-surgical treatments, insights into disease behavior and response could pave the way for standardized multimodality treatment regimens.
In this article, major international surgical societies (i.e., LACES, STS, AATS, ASCVTS) join EACTS in endorsing the recommendations of the 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. EACTS had already officially endorsed the guidelines at the time of their publication. The endorsing societies consider the 2024 ESC guidelines a comprehensive review of the best available evidence, resulting in reliable, internationally endorsed coronary guidelines. These guidelines are seen as an important and timely data-driven correction to recent developments in the coronary guideline arena, offering a thoughtful perspective that aligns with the scientific arguments and considerations raised by multiple global professional societies.
Click here to view the recent CTSNet webinar with Dr. Faisal Bakaeen that addresses the 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes.
This study evaluated outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) using lungs from donation after brain death (DBD) vs. donation after circulatory death (DCD). After analyzing 21 studies with more than 60,000 patients, researchers found that early mortality was slightly higher in the DCD group (5.5 percent vs. 4.5 percent for DBD). However, long-term survival at one, three, and five years was significantly better for DCD (86.7 percent, 75.5 percent, and 63.2 percent, respectively) compared to DBD (82.1 percent, 65.6 percent, and 51.3 percent). No significant differences were observed in rates of acute rejection, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), or postoperative complications between the groups.
This study is important for the cardiothoracic community because it highlights the potential of DCD to expand the donor pool while achieving comparable, if not superior, long-term outcomes.
This study evaluated long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD). It focused on patients who underwent primary isolated AVR, excluding those with certain conditions such as endocarditis, emergency/salvage status, or prior cardiac surgeries. The study found that, after adjusting risks, mechanical valves were associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to bioprosthetic valves for patients aged 60 or younger. These findings provide valuable information for decision-making in choosing between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves, particularly in younger patients.
The authors evaluated the five-year outcomes in low-risk patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or SAVR with concomitant procedures within the randomized PARTNER 3 trial. In the PARTNER 3 trial, 454 patients with severe, symptomatic, tricuspid aortic stenosis (AS) underwent surgery and were followed for five years. Patients were stratified into those undergoing isolated SAVR (n=334, 73.6 percent) vs. concomitant SAVR (n=120, 26.4 percent). The mean age was 73.6 plus or minus 6.1 years, and 71.1 percent were male. The median SAVR implant size was 23 mm overall. Five-year all-cause mortality was 9.0 percent for all patients (8.5 percent for isolated SAVR versus 10.2 percent for concomitant SAVR, p=0.58). The average five-year mean gradient was 11.7 plus or minus 5.6 mmHg overall. Reintervention rates were low in both groups (2.3 percent for isolated SAVR vs. 5.0 percent for concomitant SAVR, p=0.21), and the majority of patients (87.9 percent for isolated SAVR vs. 86.1 percent for concomitant SAVR) were alive with no evidence of bioprosthetic valve failure at five years. The authors concluded that SAVR in low-risk patients in the PARTNER 3 trial demonstrated excellent five-year outcomes. Five-year mortality was similar in patients undergoing isolated vs. concomitant SAVR. This was comparable to recently published national SAVR outcomes, supporting the generalizability of these findings.
This study compared isolated primary bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rSAVR) due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). The study used clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent primary isolated SAVR and isolated rSAVR due to SVD between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2022. A total of 2,620 patients, with 39.5 percent females, were included, and rSAVR was performed in 174 patients (6.6 percent). In a matched comparison of 322 patients, the rates of death or stroke did not differ between the groups. Therefore, patients undergoing rSAVR on an elective basis can expect outcomes similar to those of primary SAVR.
In this article, the authors aimed to assess whether post-implant transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis multi-detector computed characteristics differ between patients with native tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, as well as the effect on valve performance and clinical outcomes. A total of 100 consecutive post-implant multi-detector computed tomography scans were assessed. Echocardiographic prosthesis performance and clinical outcome were also evaluated. Mean eccentricity was significantly higher in the bicuspid group (0.43 (0.09) vs. 0.37 (0.08), p = 0.005, bicuspid vs. tricuspid); valvular and perivalvular thrombosis were also significantly more frequent in the bicuspid than in the tricuspid group (81% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.031); there was no significant difference in terms of the mean prosthetic gradient at follow-up between bicuspid and tricuspid valves (7.31 (5.53 mmHg) vs. 7.09 (3.05 mmHg), respectively, p = 0.825); Indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) was also similar between bicuspid and tricuspid valves (1.08 (0.12 cm2) vs. 1.03 (0.13 cm2), p = 0.101), with no significant changes compared to discharge. However, the bicuspid valve was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse events (HR:3.72, 95%CI: 1.07-13.4, p = 0.027). In conclusion, a higher level of eccentricity, which indicates prosthesis deformation, is often detected in bicuspid valves. Although echocardiographic performance was not affected, this might have led to an increased incidence of thrombosis at valvular and perivalvular levels and worse outcomes.
This retrospective analysis examined trends and outcomes of aortic valve replacement in patients under the age of 65 with aortic stenosis from 2013 to 2021, focusing on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Among 9,557 patients, TAVR usage increased from 7.1 percent to 54.7 percent during the study period. While 30-day mortality was similar between the two groups, TAVR was associated with higher six-year mortality (23.3 percent versus 10.5 percent) and a greater need for permanent pacemaker implantation. These findings suggest the need for a randomized controlled trial to compare long-term outcomes between TAVR and SAVR in younger patients.
This study compared robotic and video-assisted thymectomy to assess pathological resection status, as well as overall and disease-free survival. Data were retrieved from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons prospectively maintained thymic database, which includes 82 international centers, 37 of which agreed to participate in this study. Between October 2001 and May 2021, a total of 899 patients with thymic malignancy and who underwent minimal access surgical resection were included. After adjusting for thymoma stage, the odds of incomplete surgical resection were higher in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery than robotic. Further research is required to compare outcomes for different surgical approaches with a standardized pathological work-up.
In this study-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of early aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus clinical surveillance (CS) in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS), four RCTs were identified and included for analysis: AVATAR, RECOVERY, EARLY TAVR, EVOLVED. Prespecified outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, unplanned cardiovascular or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and stroke. A total of 1,427 patients (719 in the early AVR group and 708 in the CS group) were included for analysis.
At an average follow-up time of 4.1 years, early AVR was associated with a significant reduction in unplanned cardiovascular or HF hospitalization (14.6 percent versus 31.9 percent; HR: 0.40; 95 percent CI: 0.30-0.53;P<0.01) and stroke (4.5 percent versus 7.2 percent; HR: 0.62; 95 percent CI: 0.40-0.97;P=0.03). However, no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality (9.7 percent versus 13.7 percent; HR: 0.68; 95 percent CI: 0.40-1.17;P=0.17) and cardiovascular mortality (5.1 percent versus 8.3 percent; HR: 0.67; 95 percent CI: 0.35-1.29; P=0.23) were observed with early AVR compared with CS. The authors conclude that early AVR is associated with a significant reduction in unplanned cardiovascular or HF hospitalization and stroke, but no difference in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality compared with CS.