ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Journal and News Scan

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Jamie A Mawhinney, Craig A Mounsey, Alastair O'Brien, J Rafael Sádaba, Nick Freemantle

This article looks at the application of prognostic models within cardiothoracic surgery, and medicine in general, using a televised UK dance competition where professional dancers are paired with celebrities as an illustration. The authors use available data from previous series to make predictions about the outcome of the competition and highlight the pitfalls of misapplication of prognostic models, particularly when extrapolating conclusions from demographic data alone.

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Gomes WJ, Marin-Cuartas M, Bakaeen F, Sádaba JR, Dayan V, Almeida R et al

The ISCHEMIA trial has caused heated discussion in the cardiovascular field, with its results being used to downgrade coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) recommendations in recent guidelines. The authors of this paper performed a detailed re-analysis of the ISCHEMIA trial and critically examined its findings. Several factors are judged likely to have diluted the potential survival advantage associated with CABG. The authors concluded that the results of ISCHEMIA have been misinterpreted, that they are aligned with previous evidence and should not be used to downgrade recommendations for CABG.

Source: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Author(s): Santi Trimarchi Tom G. Gleason Derek R. Brinster Jean Bismuth Eduardo Bossone Thoralf M. Sundt Daniel G. Montgomery Chih-Wen Pai Daniele Bissacco Hector W.L. de Beaufort Joseph E. Bavaria Firas Mussa Raffi Bekeredjian Marc Schermerhorn Davide Pacini Truls Myrmel Maral Ouzounian Amit Korach Edward P. Chen Joseph S. Coselli Kim A. Eagle Himanshu J. Patel

This article is a registry review form an international voluntary registry. The retrospective historical data can be juxtaposed favorably with the recently published article on acute dissection in Denmark from a compulsory national registry. The main strength of the paper is the succinct discussion.

Source: Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Samuel Heuts, Michal J Kawczynski, Peyman Sardari Nia, Jos G Maessen, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Andrea Gabrio

Non-inferiority study designs are frequently used in randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, the long-term outcomes of TAVR are unknown, and the concept of non-inferiority is challenging to define and assess. This systematic review and meta-analysis published in Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS) compares TAVR and SAVR, specifically emphasizing the non-inferiority margin for five-year all-cause mortality. To this end, the authors performed a systematic search in three electronic databases. A total of eight RCTs (n = 8,698 patients) comparing TAVR and SAVR were included. Bayesian methods were implemented to evaluate the posterior probability of non-inferiority at different trial non-inferiority margins. The primary study outcomes were five-year actuarial all-cause mortality and the probability of non-inferiority at various transformed trial non-inferiority margins. Kaplan-Meier-derived five-year survival was 61.6 percent (95 percent CI 59.8–63.5 percent) for TAVR and 63.7 percent (95 percent CI 61.9–65.6 percent) for SAVR. The posterior median relative risk for all-cause mortality of TAVR was 1.14 compared to SAVR. The posterior probability of a mortality difference in favor of SAVR was 99.9 percent. The authors concluded that the non-inferiority of TAVR compared to SAVR is unlikely after five years in terms of all-cause mortality.

Source: Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Fatehi Hassanabad A, Imran Hamid U, Sardari Nia P

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is feasible and safe, but its uptake has lagged worldwide. The authors conducted a detailed survey of 75 surgeons, of whom 32 (42 percent) completed the survey. All who completed the survey performed more than 25 MIMVS cases annually. 62 percent used a fully endoscopic approach, whereas 52 percent had used endoscopically assisted strategies. Smaller proportions had used direct visualization (17 percent) or a robot (20 percent). There was wide variability in views on the necessary training and approach to MIMVS, suggesting that consensus guidelines should be established.

Source: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Author(s): Francesco Pollari, Paolo Berretta, Alberto Albertini et al.

Degenerative aortic valve stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease in western countries, and valve replacement is the gold standard for symptomatic severe cases. In addition to the two established procedures (surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] and transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]), the last decade showed the rising of a third way, which is based on the concept of the surgical replacement but takes some advantages of the TAVI prosthesis's design, such as the faster and simpler anchoring mechanism. This category includes the interventions performed with the sutureless and the rapid deployment prostheses. Sutureless and rapid-deployment (SURD-AVR) has been applied to high- and intermediate-risk populations with good clinical results. However, concerns were raised because of the incidence of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which was higher than in conventional SAVR and similar to that observed following TAVI. Possible factors associated with this complication have been assessed only in single-center studies with small sample populations. Moreover, recent analyses reported a reduction of this complication over time, suggesting the possible role of a time bias or learning curve effect. For these reasons, the authors aimed to investigate the need for PPI following SURD-AVR in a large cohort using a progress report approach.

Source: The American Journal of Cardiology
Author(s): Maninder Singh, Zachary A. Sporn, Hartzell V. Schaff, Patricia A. Pellikka

In this study, the authors performed a propensity matched analysis of hospital costs for robotic-assisted CABG vs. conventional CABG. 1,173 patients were included in the analysis from 2018 until 2021. Decision regarding intervention modality was decided by the treating surgeon. Following propensity matching, the sample consisted of 267 patients per group. Total costs considered those both directly and indirectly related to the surgery including operating room time, hospital stay, expendables, medical records, and administrations.

Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Maria W. Pedersen, Kristian Kragholm, Riina Oksjoki, Jacob E. Møller, Anna Gundlund, Emil Fosbøl, Dorte G. Nielsen, Lars Køber, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Peter Søgaard, Niels H. Andersen

In this mandatory national clinical registry analysis of acute aortic dissections, in-hospital mortality was 18 percent in 859 patients who underwent repair of type A dissections vs. 52 percent in 298 unoperated-on type A patients, and 13 percent in 122 patients who underwent surgical or endovascular repair of type B dissections vs. 13 percent in 434 unoperated-on type B patients. Unadjusted three-year survival in patients discharged alive was 91 percent after type A dissection repair vs. 78 percent without surgery, and 83 percent after type B repair vs. 77 percent without surgery.

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Marinos Koulouroudias, Michele Di Mauro, Roberto Lorusso

The use of bioprostheses for mitral valve replacement is well established and steadily increasing worldwide. However, long-term durability is not well described. Accurate mitral valve bioprosthetic durability reports are necessary to set a standard against which transcatheter mitral valve replacement can be compared. This systematic review aimed to assess the outcomes of bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement based on data from studies published over the last twenty years. Only studies with follow-up beyond a minimum of five years were included in the analysis.

A total of twenty-one studies, including 15.833 patients, were identified and analyzed. Among all implanted bioprostheses, 64 percent were porcine and 36 percent were bovine pericardial. Freedom from structural valve deterioration at ten years ranged from 58.9 percent to 100 percent and at fifteen years from 58.3 percent to 93 percent. Freedom from reoperation ranged from 65 percent to 98.7 percent at ten years and 78.5 percent to 91 percent at fifteen years. There is, however, a lack of information regarding the preoperative baseline mitral valve pathology and insufficient echocardiographic follow-up. Hence, despite the reported results, the authors concluded that there is a considerable variability in reporting long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and therefore an unbiased and generalizable understanding of the long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement is difficult across the spectrum of mitral valve pathologies requiring replacement surgery.

Source: The New England Journal of Medicine
Author(s): A. Michael Lincoff, M.D., Kirstine Brown-Frandsen, M.D., Helen M. Colhoun, M.D., John Deanfield, M.D., Scott S. Emerson, M.D., Ph.D., Sille Esbjerg, M.Sc., Søren Hardt-Lindberg, M.D., Ph.D., G. Kees Hovingh, M.D., Ph.D., Steven E. Kahn, M.B., Ch.B., Robert F. Kushner, M.D., Ildiko Lingvay, M.D., M.P.H., Tugce K. Oral, M.D., et al., for the SELECT Trial Investigators

This Novo Nordisk funded, multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial explored whether semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) can reduce cardiovascular risk associated with overweight and obesity in the absence of diabetes. The authors recruited 17,604 patients over forty-five years of age with preexisting cardiovascular disease, and a BMI of 27 or greater with no history of diabetes. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 2.4 mg of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide or a placebo. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke in a time to first event analysis. Mean duration of follow up was 39.8 (+/-9.4) months. It was found that weekly subcutaneous semaglutide was superior to the placebo at reducing poor outcomes.

Pages