ALERT!

This site is not optimized for Internet Explorer 8 (or older).

Please upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or use an alternate browser such as Chrome or Firefox.

Journal and News Scan

Source: Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland
Author(s): SCTS Contributors

SCTS reported that Dr. Marian Ionescu, a pioneer in cardiac surgery, has passed away. In addition to inventing several artificial heart valves, Dr. Ionescu was a medical educator and established numerous fellowships for cardiothoracic surgeons and allied health professionals.

Source: Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Miura K, Eguchi T, Ide S, Mishima S, Matsuoka S, Takeda T et al

Segmentectomy is on the rise, but understanding of the segmental bronchial branching pattern is limited. Computed tomography scans of 303 patients were used to determine and categorize the branching of the right upper lobe bronchi. Four major types and eleven subtypes were identified. Volumetry was done to determine the predominant segment in each case. The order of frequency of branching types was trifurcated nondefective (64.4 percent), then bifurcated nondefective (22.1 percent), bifurcated defective (8.6 percent), and trifurcated half-defective (4.0 percent). In 71 percent of cases, one segment was volumetrically predominant, and in 52 percent of all cases this was segment three. There was a higher risk of complex branching in the volumetrically nonpredominant segment and care should be taken during segmentectomy of these segments.

Source: STS and EACTS
Author(s): Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) published a joint press release regarding aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients. Both associations highlight the value of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as outstanding therapeutic options for patients with aortic stenosis and acknowledge the important role of TAVI in high-risk or advanced-age patients. 

Furthermore, STS and EACTS welcome randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying low- and intermediate-risk populations to help inform clinical decision making. Despite the interesting insights of the recently presented and simultaneously published five-year PARTNER 3 and four-year Evolut low-risk trials results, and given the highly selected cohorts and the industry sponsored nature of these trials, both societies consider some equipoise statements as inappropriately weighted. Therefore, STS and EACTS suggest caution in adopting a TAVI-first strategy in low-risk patients, particularly in those patients who differ from the specific cohorts studied in these low-risk trials. Before encouraging a TAVI-first strategy in low-risk patients, more follow-up time from the existing low-risk trials is required. 

Finally, STS and EACTS encourage the investigators from both low-risk trials to publish their results for the isolated SAVR and isolated TAVI arms to allow valve therapy specialists to compare low-risk TAVI all-cause mortality outcomes with the real world analysis of patients undergoing low-risk isolated SAVR in the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (Thourani VH, et al., The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, October 2023). Until this data is available, any statements or conclusions from the PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials are still hypothesis-generating and speculative.

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Baptiste Bazire, Marylou Para, Richard Raffoul, Patrick Nataf, Agnès Cachier, Fabrice Extramiana, Bernard Iung, Vincent Algala

Surgical tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is associated with a high risk of postoperative atrioventricular (AV) block. However, placing pacemaker leads through a tricuspid bioprosthesis is discouraged since it might impair bioprosthesis function. Hence, alternative pacing approaches should be considered according to current cardiac pacing guidelines. 

This single center retrospective study assessed the benefits and risks of prophylactic epicardial pacemaker implantation during TVR. A total of eighty patients, with a mean age of fifty-seven years, who underwent TVR with concomitant prophylactic epicardial pacemaker implantation were analyzed. TVR was isolated in 28, or 35 percent of patients, but patients with other concomitant procedures were also included. During the postoperative period, with a mean follow-up period of thirty-five months, heart rhythm was analyzed in fifty-nine out of eighty patients. Cardiac pacing was needed in twenty-seven out of fifty-nine, or 46 percent of patients. Eight, or 14 percent, of patients had complete pacing dependency; ten, or 17 percent, of patients had a high degree AV block; nine, or 15 percent, of patients had a high ventricular pacing rate of over 80 percent. A postoperative spontaneous heart rate of over 70 bpm (P = 0.02) and the presence of a narrow QRS-complex (P = 0.03) were identified as predictors of lower cardiac pacing requirement. Epicardial pacemaker implantation was safe, with related complications observed in two, or 2.5 percent of patients. 

Given the frequent occurrence of AV block following TVR and the acceptable safety profile, the authors concluded that the prophylactic epicardial pacing strategy in patients undergoing TVR should be considered. The results from this study provide additional information to discuss the need for prophylactic epicardial pacing in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery.

Source: Circulation
Author(s): Bobby Yanagawa, Marina Ibrahim, Jennifer Lawton

This article reviews the benefits of diversity among cardiac surgeons. Specifically, the authors outline the urgent need for redistribution of access and opportunities for women in cardiothoracic surgery and the steps that have been taken to increase equity. Some of these steps include ensuring safety in the profession, providing mentorship, offering educational opportunities, and promoting awareness of implicit bias.

Source: JACC
Author(s): Shahnawaz Amdani, Othman A. Aljohani, James K. Kirklin, Ryan Cantor, Devin Koehl, Kurt Schumacher, Deipanjan Nandi, Michael Khoury, William Dreyer, Kirsten Rose-Felker, Colleen Nasman, and Mariska S. Kemna

This study determined which measurement—height, weight, BMI, BSA, predicted heart mass, total cardiac volume (TCV)—is most important for assessing donor-recipient heart size mismatch. Amdani and colleagues investigated the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database to address this question and identify the effects of donor-recipient size mismatch using a range of parameters. Outcomes were assessed at one and five years of follow up. Interestingly, they report that height and TCV are more relevant to long-term risk of graft loss compared to other metrics. 

Source: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Gaudino M, Bakaeen FG, Sandner S, Aldea GS, Arai H, Chikwe J et al

The authors performed a systematic review of the evidence supporting the use of different conduits for CABG. Their overall conclusion was that coronary artery bypass grafting strategy must be individualized. The radial artery (RA) graft has better patency rates and fewer adverse cardiac events compared with saphenous vein graft (SVG). Right internal thoracic artery (RITA) patency shows no clear evidence of superiority over SVG. Observational studies suggest that RITA may be superior to SVG in terms of survival time and outcomes. However, the only randomized trial was neutral. There is limited data on use of the right gastroepiploic artery and more evidence is needed on endoscopic vein harvesting. No-touch SVG harvesting was found to have better patency rates than traditional SVG harvesting.

Source: The New England Journal of Medicine
Author(s): Michael J. Mack, Martin B. Leon, Vinod H. Thourani, Philippe Pibarot, Ph.D., Rebecca T. Hahn, Philippe Genereux, Susheel K. Kodali, Samir R. Kapadia, David J. Cohen, Stuart J. Pocock, Michael Lu, Roseann White, Molly Szerlip, Julien Ternacle, S. Chris Malaisrie, Howard C. Herrmann, Wilson Y. Szeto, Mark J. Russo, Vasilis Babaliaros, Craig R. Smith, Philipp Blanke, John G. Webb, and Raj Makkar, for the PARTNER 3 Investigators

The outcomes of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years (5y PARTNER 3 trial) were presented during the late-breaking clinical trial session of TCT 2023 and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The results give valuable insights and add new evidence for the decision making and treatment of low-risk patients with severe symptomatic AS.

The PARTNER 3 trial randomly assigned 1,000 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and low surgical risk (STS-PROM < 4 percent) to undergo either transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a balloon expandable bioprosthesis (503 patients) or surgical aortic valve replacement (497 patients) with a prespecified superiority hypothesis. The two primary endpoints were composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization, and hierarchical composite of death, disabling stroke, nondisabling stroke, and the number of rehospitalization days.

At five years, there was no significant difference in the risk of death, stroke, or rehospitalizations between the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) arms. The Kaplan–Meier estimates were 22.8 percent vs. 27.2 percent in the TAVR and SAVR groups, respectively; p=0.07. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier curves did not show a statistical difference in the five-year all-cause mortality. At five years, there was a mortality of 10.0 percent vs. 8.2 percent in the TAVR and SAVR groups, respectively; HR 1.23 and 95 percent CI 0.79-1.90. Remarkably, the Kaplan-Meier all-cause mortality curves initially showed an early result favoring TAVR, but beyond one year, attenuation of the observed differences occurred, with the curves crossing close to 36 months. The risk of cardiovascular (HR 1.08; 95 percent CI 0.61–1.92) and noncardiovascular (HR 1.46; 95 percent CI 0.74–2.90) mortality was similar in both groups. Valve hemodynamics were similar in both study arms, with a mean valve gradient 12.8±6.5 mmHg vs. 11.7±5.6 mmHg in the TAVR and SAVR groups, respectively. 

Moreover, bioprosthetic valve failure defined by VARC-3 criteria occurred at similarly low rates in both groups: 3.3 percent vs. 3.8 percent in the TAVR and SAVR groups, respectively. However, TAVR was associated with an increased risk of valve thrombosis: 0.2 percent vs. 2.5 percent; HR 10.52 (95 percent CI 1.37–80.93). Patient-reported health status was similar in the two groups, with a mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire–Overall Summary score (KCCQ-OS) of 86.2 vs. 85.9 in the TAVR and SAVR groups, respectively. Similarly, 84.4 percent vs. 86.0 percent of the patients in the TAVR and SAVR groups presented with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II at five years, respectively.

Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Vinod H. Thourani, Robert Habib, Wilson Y. Szeto, Joseph F. Sabik, Jennifer C. Romano, Thomas E. MacGillivray, Vinay Badhwar

To create a benchmark for the use of TAVR for aortic stenosis treatment in low-risk patients, this study evaluated outcomes of similar patients undergoing SAVR. The STS database was used to isolate low-risk SAVR patients from 2011–2019. Results revealed that when STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) was below 1 percent or the patient age was below seventy-five years, the eight-year survival rate after SAVR was 95 percent. The authors concluded that the survival rate following SAVR remains excellent, and that this data can be used in the balanced interpretation of further trials comparing SAVR and TAVR.

Source: Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Author(s): Ponte C, Alkhatiri O, Olland A, and Falcoz P-E

The authors performed a structured review of the evidence surrounding the effect of donor age in lung transplantation. They examined whether or not lungs from donors over sixty years old had equivalent outcomes to lungs from younger donors. Twelve articles supplied the best evidence to answer this question. It was notable that recipients with interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or cystic fibrosis had worse overall survival with grafts from older donors. The authors concluded that when allocated to the recipient who would most benefit, lung grafts from older donors offer results comparable to those obtained with younger donors.

Pages